Information on Result #520177
There is no (21, 66, 36)-net in base 2, because extracting embedded OOA would yield OOA(266, 36, S2, 2, 45), but
- the (dual) Plotkin bound for OOAs shows that M ≥ 2361 183241 434822 606848 / 23 > 266 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (21, 67, 36)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
2 | No (21, 68, 36)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
3 | No (21, 69, 36)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
4 | No (21, 70, 36)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
5 | No (21, 71, 36)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
6 | No (21, 72, 36)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
7 | No (21, 73, 36)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
8 | No (21, 74, 36)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
9 | No (21, 75, 36)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
10 | No (21, 76, 36)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
11 | No (21, 77, 36)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
12 | No (21, 78, 36)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
13 | No (21, 79, 36)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
14 | No (21, 80, 36)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
15 | No (21, 81, 36)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
16 | No (21, 82, 36)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
17 | No (21, 83, 36)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
18 | No (21, 84, 36)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
19 | No (21, 85, 36)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
20 | No (21, 86, 36)-net in base 2 | [i] |