Information on Result #520194
There is no (23, 72, 39)-net in base 2, because extracting embedded OOA would yield OOA(272, 39, S2, 2, 49), but
- the (dual) Plotkin bound for OOAs shows that M ≥ 37778 931862 957161 709568 / 5 > 272 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (23, 73, 39)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
2 | No (23, 74, 39)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
3 | No (23, 75, 39)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
4 | No (23, 76, 39)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
5 | No (23, 77, 39)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
6 | No (23, 78, 39)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
7 | No (23, 79, 39)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
8 | No (23, 80, 39)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
9 | No (23, 81, 39)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
10 | No (23, 82, 39)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
11 | No (23, 83, 39)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
12 | No (23, 84, 39)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
13 | No (23, 85, 39)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
14 | No (23, 86, 39)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
15 | No (23, 87, 39)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
16 | No (23, 88, 39)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
17 | No (23, 89, 39)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
18 | No (23, 90, 39)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
19 | No (23, 91, 39)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
20 | No (23, 92, 39)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
21 | No (23, 93, 39)-net in base 2 | [i] |