Information on Result #520305
There is no (35, 104, 55)-net in base 2, because extracting embedded OOA would yield OOA(2104, 55, S2, 2, 69), but
- the (dual) Plotkin bound for OOAs shows that M ≥ 162 259276 829213 363391 578010 288128 / 7 > 2104 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (35, 105, 55)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
2 | No (35, 106, 55)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
3 | No (35, 107, 55)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
4 | No (35, 108, 55)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
5 | No (35, 109, 55)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
6 | No (35, 110, 55)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
7 | No (35, 111, 55)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
8 | No (35, 112, 55)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
9 | No (35, 113, 55)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
10 | No (35, 114, 55)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
11 | No (35, 115, 55)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
12 | No (35, 116, 55)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
13 | No (35, 117, 55)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
14 | No (35, 118, 55)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
15 | No (35, 119, 55)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
16 | No (35, 120, 55)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
17 | No (35, 121, 55)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
18 | No (35, 122, 55)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
19 | No (35, 123, 55)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
20 | No (35, 124, 55)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
21 | No (35, 125, 55)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
22 | No (35, 126, 55)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
23 | No (35, 127, 55)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
24 | No (35, 128, 55)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
25 | No (35, 129, 55)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
26 | No (35, 130, 55)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
27 | No (35, 131, 55)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
28 | No (35, 132, 55)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
29 | No (35, 133, 55)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
30 | No (35, 134, 55)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
31 | No (35, 135, 55)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
32 | No (35, 136, 55)-net in base 2 | [i] |