Information on Result #520361
There is no (40, 240, 50)-net in base 2, because extracting embedded OOA would yield OOA(2240, 50, S2, 5, 200), but
- the LP bound with quadratic polynomials shows that M ≥ 669 635037 551007 660912 069752 781566 117498 616396 915859 585128 088750 289902 895104 / 335 > 2240 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (40, 241, 50)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
2 | No (40, 242, 50)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
3 | No (40, 243, 50)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
4 | No (40, 244, 50)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
5 | No (40, 245, 50)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
6 | No (40, 246, 50)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
7 | No (40, 247, 50)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
8 | No (40, 248, 50)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
9 | No (40, 249, 50)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
10 | No (40, 250, 50)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
11 | No (40, 251, 50)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
12 | No (40, 252, 50)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
13 | No (40, 253, 50)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
14 | No (40, 254, 50)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
15 | No (40, 255, 50)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
16 | No (40, 256, 50)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
17 | No (40, 257, 50)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
18 | No (40, 258, 50)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
19 | No (40, 259, 50)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
20 | No (40, 260, 50)-net in base 2 | [i] |