Information on Result #520476
There is no (51, 244, 63)-net in base 2, because extracting embedded OOA would yield OOA(2244, 63, S2, 4, 193), but
- the (dual) Plotkin bound for OOAs shows that M ≥ 3844 659212 957764 301173 255361 616590 690440 604959 601346 852872 615094 012740 632576 / 97 > 2244 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (51, 245, 63)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
2 | No (51, 246, 63)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
3 | No (51, 247, 63)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
4 | No (51, 248, 63)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
5 | No (51, 249, 63)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
6 | No (51, 250, 63)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
7 | No (51, 251, 63)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
8 | No (51, 252, 63)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
9 | No (51, 253, 63)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
10 | No (51, 254, 63)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
11 | No (51, 255, 63)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
12 | No (51, 256, 63)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
13 | No (51, 257, 63)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
14 | No (51, 258, 63)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
15 | No (51, 259, 63)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
16 | No (51, 260, 63)-net in base 2 | [i] |