Information on Result #520486
There is no (52, 248, 64)-net in base 2, because extracting embedded OOA would yield OOA(2248, 64, S2, 4, 196), but
- the (dual) Plotkin bound for OOAs shows that M ≥ 115792 089237 316195 423570 985008 687907 853269 984665 640564 039457 584007 913129 639936 / 197 > 2248 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (52, 249, 64)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
| 2 | No (52, 250, 64)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 3 | No (52, 251, 64)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 4 | No (52, 252, 64)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 5 | No (52, 253, 64)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 6 | No (52, 254, 64)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 7 | No (52, 255, 64)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 8 | No (52, 256, 64)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 9 | No (52, 257, 64)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 10 | No (52, 258, 64)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 11 | No (52, 259, 64)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 12 | No (52, 260, 64)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||