Information on Result #520543
There is no (59, 119, 130)-net in base 2, because extracting embedded orthogonal array would yield OA(2119, 130, S2, 60), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 16610 033035 328308 747805 973025 263185 821696 / 21793 > 2119 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (59, 120, 130)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
| 2 | No (59, 121, 130)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 3 | No (59, 122, 130)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 4 | No (59, 123, 130)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 5 | No (59, 124, 130)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 6 | No (59, 125, 130)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 7 | No (59, 126, 130)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 8 | No (59, 127, 130)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 9 | No (59, 128, 130)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 10 | No (59, 129, 130)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 11 | No (59, 130, 130)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 12 | No (59, 131, 130)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 13 | No (59, 132, 130)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||