Information on Result #520550
There is no (60, 120, 132)-net in base 2, because extracting embedded orthogonal array would yield OA(2120, 132, S2, 60), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 16503 694795 665515 477973 668460 440758 255616 / 10323 > 2120 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (60, 121, 132)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
| 2 | No (60, 122, 132)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 3 | No (60, 123, 132)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 4 | No (60, 124, 132)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 5 | No (60, 125, 132)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 6 | No (60, 126, 132)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 7 | No (60, 127, 132)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 8 | No (60, 128, 132)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 9 | No (60, 129, 132)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 10 | No (60, 130, 132)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 11 | No (60, 131, 132)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 12 | No (60, 132, 132)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 13 | No (60, 133, 132)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||