Information on Result #520575
There is no (64, 128, 140)-net in base 2, because extracting embedded orthogonal array would yield OA(2128, 140, S2, 64), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 174224 571863 520493 293247 799005 065324 265472 / 429 > 2128 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (64, 129, 140)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
2 | No (64, 130, 140)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
3 | No (64, 131, 140)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
4 | No (64, 132, 140)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
5 | No (64, 133, 140)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
6 | No (64, 134, 140)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
7 | No (64, 135, 140)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
8 | No (64, 136, 140)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
9 | No (64, 137, 140)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
10 | No (64, 138, 140)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
11 | No (64, 139, 140)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
12 | No (64, 140, 140)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
13 | No (64, 141, 140)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
14 | No (64, 142, 140)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
15 | No (64, 143, 140)-net in base 2 | [i] |