MinT - Information on Result #520577

Information on Result #520577

There is no (64, 238, 82)-net in base 2, because extracting embedded OOA would yield OOA(2²³⁸, 82, S₂, 3, 174), but

the (dual) Plotkin bound for OOAs shows that MÂ â‰¥ 84 808659 109362 447819 998280 035660 088759 719227 050029 709989 837097 662045 749248 / 175 > 2²³⁸ [i]

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

	Result		This result only	Method
1	No (64, 239, 82)-net in base 2	[i]		m-Reduction
2	No (64, 240, 82)-net in base 2	[i]
3	No (64, 241, 82)-net in base 2	[i]
4	No (64, 242, 82)-net in base 2	[i]
5	No (64, 243, 82)-net in base 2	[i]
6	No (64, 244, 82)-net in base 2	[i]
7	No (64, 245, 82)-net in base 2	[i]
8	No (64, 246, 82)-net in base 2	[i]
9	No (64, 247, 82)-net in base 2	[i]
10	No (64, 248, 82)-net in base 2	[i]
11	No (64, 249, 82)-net in base 2	[i]
12	No (64, 250, 82)-net in base 2	[i]
13	No (64, 251, 82)-net in base 2	[i]
14	No (64, 252, 82)-net in base 2	[i]
15	No (64, 253, 82)-net in base 2	[i]
16	No (64, 254, 82)-net in base 2	[i]
17	No (64, 255, 82)-net in base 2	[i]
18	No (64, 256, 82)-net in base 2	[i]
19	No (64, 257, 82)-net in base 2	[i]
20	No (64, 258, 82)-net in base 2	[i]
21	No (64, 259, 82)-net in base 2	[i]
22	No (64, 260, 82)-net in base 2	[i]