Information on Result #520588
There is no (66, 245, 84)-net in base 2, because extracting embedded OOA would yield OOA(2245, 84, S2, 3, 179), but
- the (dual) Plotkin bound for OOAs shows that M ≥ 904 625697 166532 776746 648320 380374 280103 671755 200316 906558 262375 061821 325312 / 15 > 2245 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (66, 246, 84)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
| 2 | No (66, 247, 84)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 3 | No (66, 248, 84)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 4 | No (66, 249, 84)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 5 | No (66, 250, 84)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 6 | No (66, 251, 84)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 7 | No (66, 252, 84)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 8 | No (66, 253, 84)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 9 | No (66, 254, 84)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 10 | No (66, 255, 84)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 11 | No (66, 256, 84)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 12 | No (66, 257, 84)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 13 | No (66, 258, 84)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 14 | No (66, 259, 84)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 15 | No (66, 260, 84)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||