Information on Result #520592

There is no (67, 250, 86)-net in base 2, because extracting embedded OOA would yield OOA(2250, 86, S2, 3, 183), but

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (67, 251, 86)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction
2No (67, 252, 86)-net in base 2 [i]
3No (67, 253, 86)-net in base 2 [i]
4No (67, 254, 86)-net in base 2 [i]
5No (67, 255, 86)-net in base 2 [i]
6No (67, 256, 86)-net in base 2 [i]
7No (67, 257, 86)-net in base 2 [i]
8No (67, 258, 86)-net in base 2 [i]
9No (67, 259, 86)-net in base 2 [i]
10No (67, 260, 86)-net in base 2 [i]