Information on Result #520597
There is no (69, 139, 150)-net in base 2, because extracting embedded orthogonal array would yield OA(2139, 150, S2, 70), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 6082 528252 899227 461853 867158 864840 600756 158464 / 8127 > 2139 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (69, 140, 150)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
2 | No (69, 141, 150)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
3 | No (69, 142, 150)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
4 | No (69, 143, 150)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
5 | No (69, 144, 150)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
6 | No (69, 145, 150)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
7 | No (69, 146, 150)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
8 | No (69, 147, 150)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
9 | No (69, 148, 150)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
10 | No (69, 149, 150)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
11 | No (69, 150, 150)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
12 | No (69, 151, 150)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
13 | No (69, 152, 150)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
14 | No (69, 153, 150)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
15 | No (69, 154, 150)-net in base 2 | [i] |