Information on Result #520642

There is no (85, 239, 123)-net in base 2, because extracting embedded OOA would yield OOA(2239, 123, S2, 2, 154), but

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (85, 240, 123)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction
2No (85, 241, 123)-net in base 2 [i]
3No (85, 242, 123)-net in base 2 [i]
4No (85, 243, 123)-net in base 2 [i]
5No (85, 244, 123)-net in base 2 [i]
6No (85, 245, 123)-net in base 2 [i]
7No (85, 246, 123)-net in base 2 [i]
8No (85, 247, 123)-net in base 2 [i]
9No (85, 248, 123)-net in base 2 [i]
10No (85, 249, 123)-net in base 2 [i]
11No (85, 250, 123)-net in base 2 [i]
12No (85, 251, 123)-net in base 2 [i]
13No (85, 252, 123)-net in base 2 [i]
14No (85, 253, 123)-net in base 2 [i]
15No (85, 254, 123)-net in base 2 [i]
16No (85, 255, 123)-net in base 2 [i]
17No (85, 256, 123)-net in base 2 [i]
18No (85, 257, 123)-net in base 2 [i]
19No (85, 258, 123)-net in base 2 [i]
20No (85, 259, 123)-net in base 2 [i]
21No (85, 260, 123)-net in base 2 [i]