Information on Result #520654
There is no (88, 247, 128)-net in base 2, because extracting embedded OOA would yield OOA(2247, 128, S2, 2, 159), but
- the LP bound with quadratic polynomials shows that M ≥ 1243 860333 603982 568026 641440 523014 635142 548663 400435 746517 610765 710004 322304 / 5 > 2247 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (88, 248, 128)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
| 2 | No (88, 249, 128)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 3 | No (88, 250, 128)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 4 | No (88, 251, 128)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 5 | No (88, 252, 128)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 6 | No (88, 253, 128)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 7 | No (88, 254, 128)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 8 | No (88, 255, 128)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 9 | No (88, 256, 128)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 10 | No (88, 257, 128)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 11 | No (88, 258, 128)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 12 | No (88, 259, 128)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 13 | No (88, 260, 128)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||