Information on Result #520659
There is no (89, 250, 129)-net in base 2, because extracting embedded OOA would yield OOA(2250, 129, S2, 2, 161), but
- the (dual) Plotkin bound for OOAs shows that M ≥ 57896 044618 658097 711785 492504 343953 926634 992332 820282 019728 792003 956564 819968 / 27 > 2250 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (89, 251, 129)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
| 2 | No (89, 252, 129)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 3 | No (89, 253, 129)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 4 | No (89, 254, 129)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 5 | No (89, 255, 129)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 6 | No (89, 256, 129)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 7 | No (89, 257, 129)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 8 | No (89, 258, 129)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 9 | No (89, 259, 129)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 10 | No (89, 260, 129)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||