Information on Result #520709
There is no (98, 198, 209)-net in base 2, because extracting embedded orthogonal array would yield OA(2198, 209, S2, 100), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 1298 405939 761264 142637 905370 611659 382837 940018 976496 610923 511808 / 3111 > 2198 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (98, 199, 209)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
2 | No (98, 200, 209)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
3 | No (98, 201, 209)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
4 | No (98, 202, 209)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
5 | No (98, 203, 209)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
6 | No (98, 204, 209)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
7 | No (98, 205, 209)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
8 | No (98, 206, 209)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
9 | No (98, 207, 209)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
10 | No (98, 208, 209)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
11 | No (98, 209, 209)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
12 | No (98, 210, 209)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
13 | No (98, 211, 209)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
14 | No (98, 212, 209)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
15 | No (98, 213, 209)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
16 | No (98, 214, 209)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
17 | No (98, 215, 209)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
18 | No (98, 216, 209)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
19 | No (98, 217, 209)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
20 | No (98, 218, 209)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
21 | No (98, 219, 209)-net in base 2 | [i] |