Information on Result #520709

There is no (98, 198, 209)-net in base 2, because extracting embedded orthogonal array would yield OA(2198, 209, S2, 100), but

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (98, 199, 209)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction
2No (98, 200, 209)-net in base 2 [i]
3No (98, 201, 209)-net in base 2 [i]
4No (98, 202, 209)-net in base 2 [i]
5No (98, 203, 209)-net in base 2 [i]
6No (98, 204, 209)-net in base 2 [i]
7No (98, 205, 209)-net in base 2 [i]
8No (98, 206, 209)-net in base 2 [i]
9No (98, 207, 209)-net in base 2 [i]
10No (98, 208, 209)-net in base 2 [i]
11No (98, 209, 209)-net in base 2 [i]
12No (98, 210, 209)-net in base 2 [i]
13No (98, 211, 209)-net in base 2 [i]
14No (98, 212, 209)-net in base 2 [i]
15No (98, 213, 209)-net in base 2 [i]
16No (98, 214, 209)-net in base 2 [i]
17No (98, 215, 209)-net in base 2 [i]
18No (98, 216, 209)-net in base 2 [i]
19No (98, 217, 209)-net in base 2 [i]
20No (98, 218, 209)-net in base 2 [i]
21No (98, 219, 209)-net in base 2 [i]