MinT - Information on Result #520724

Information on Result #520724

There is no (100, 200, 212)-net in base 2, because extracting embedded orthogonal array would yield OA(2²⁰⁰, 212, S₂, 100), but

the linear programming bound shows that MÂ â‰¥ 53067 521973 608894 859497 756137 474553 785693 231666 682950 592992 641024 / 29087 > 2²⁰⁰ [i]

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

	Result		This result only	Method
1	No (100, 201, 212)-net in base 2	[i]		m-Reduction
2	No (100, 202, 212)-net in base 2	[i]
3	No (100, 203, 212)-net in base 2	[i]
4	No (100, 204, 212)-net in base 2	[i]
5	No (100, 205, 212)-net in base 2	[i]
6	No (100, 206, 212)-net in base 2	[i]
7	No (100, 207, 212)-net in base 2	[i]
8	No (100, 208, 212)-net in base 2	[i]
9	No (100, 209, 212)-net in base 2	[i]
10	No (100, 210, 212)-net in base 2	[i]
11	No (100, 211, 212)-net in base 2	[i]
12	No (100, 212, 212)-net in base 2	[i]
13	No (100, 213, 212)-net in base 2	[i]
14	No (100, 214, 212)-net in base 2	[i]
15	No (100, 215, 212)-net in base 2	[i]
16	No (100, 216, 212)-net in base 2	[i]
17	No (100, 217, 212)-net in base 2	[i]
18	No (100, 218, 212)-net in base 2	[i]
19	No (100, 219, 212)-net in base 2	[i]
20	No (100, 220, 212)-net in base 2	[i]
21	No (100, 221, 212)-net in base 2	[i]
22	No (100, 222, 212)-net in base 2	[i]
23	No (100, 223, 212)-net in base 2	[i]