Information on Result #520758
There is no (104, 206, 219)-net in base 2, because extracting embedded orthogonal array would yield OA(2206, 219, S2, 102), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 78984 218751 417890 023438 520762 752824 239171 321550 411833 440733 233152 / 767 > 2206 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (104, 207, 219)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
2 | No (104, 208, 219)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
3 | No (104, 209, 219)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
4 | No (104, 210, 219)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
5 | No (104, 211, 219)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
6 | No (104, 212, 219)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
7 | No (104, 213, 219)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
8 | No (104, 214, 219)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
9 | No (104, 215, 219)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
10 | No (104, 216, 219)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
11 | No (104, 217, 219)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
12 | No (104, 218, 219)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
13 | No (104, 219, 219)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
14 | No (104, 220, 219)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
15 | No (104, 221, 219)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
16 | No (104, 222, 219)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
17 | No (104, 223, 219)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
18 | No (104, 224, 219)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
19 | No (104, 225, 219)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
20 | No (104, 226, 219)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
21 | No (104, 227, 219)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
22 | No (104, 228, 219)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
23 | No (104, 229, 219)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
24 | No (104, 230, 219)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
25 | No (104, 231, 219)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
26 | No (104, 232, 219)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
27 | No (104, 233, 219)-net in base 2 | [i] |