Information on Result #520816
There is no (109, 217, 230)-net in base 2, because extracting embedded orthogonal array would yield OA(2217, 230, S2, 108), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 26 959946 667150 639794 667015 087019 630673 637144 422540 572481 103610 249216 / 93 > 2217 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (109, 218, 230)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
2 | No (109, 219, 230)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
3 | No (109, 220, 230)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
4 | No (109, 221, 230)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
5 | No (109, 222, 230)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
6 | No (109, 223, 230)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
7 | No (109, 224, 230)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
8 | No (109, 225, 230)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
9 | No (109, 226, 230)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
10 | No (109, 227, 230)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
11 | No (109, 228, 230)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
12 | No (109, 229, 230)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
13 | No (109, 230, 230)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
14 | No (109, 231, 230)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
15 | No (109, 232, 230)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
16 | No (109, 233, 230)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
17 | No (109, 234, 230)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
18 | No (109, 235, 230)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
19 | No (109, 236, 230)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
20 | No (109, 237, 230)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
21 | No (109, 238, 230)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
22 | No (109, 239, 230)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
23 | No (109, 240, 230)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
24 | No (109, 241, 230)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
25 | No (109, 242, 230)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
26 | No (109, 243, 230)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
27 | No (109, 244, 230)-net in base 2 | [i] |