Information on Result #520828
There is no (110, 218, 231)-net in base 2, because extracting embedded orthogonal array would yield OA(2218, 231, S2, 108), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 5176 309760 092922 840576 066896 707769 089338 331729 127789 916371 893167 849472 / 11935 > 2218 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (110, 219, 231)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
2 | No (110, 220, 231)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
3 | No (110, 221, 231)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
4 | No (110, 222, 231)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
5 | No (110, 223, 231)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
6 | No (110, 224, 231)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
7 | No (110, 225, 231)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
8 | No (110, 226, 231)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
9 | No (110, 227, 231)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
10 | No (110, 228, 231)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
11 | No (110, 229, 231)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
12 | No (110, 230, 231)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
13 | No (110, 231, 231)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
14 | No (110, 232, 231)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
15 | No (110, 233, 231)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
16 | No (110, 234, 231)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
17 | No (110, 235, 231)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
18 | No (110, 236, 231)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
19 | No (110, 237, 231)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
20 | No (110, 238, 231)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
21 | No (110, 239, 231)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
22 | No (110, 240, 231)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
23 | No (110, 241, 231)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
24 | No (110, 242, 231)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
25 | No (110, 243, 231)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
26 | No (110, 244, 231)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
27 | No (110, 245, 231)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
28 | No (110, 246, 231)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
29 | No (110, 247, 231)-net in base 2 | [i] |