Information on Result #520920
There is no (119, 227, 253)-net in base 2, because extracting embedded orthogonal array would yield OA(2227, 253, S2, 108), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 1 712203 785605 983237 422274 858937 442274 888487 302396 946690 603779 286305 242924 187648 / 5817 546149 > 2227 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (119, 228, 253)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
2 | No (119, 229, 253)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
3 | No (119, 230, 253)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
4 | No (119, 231, 253)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
5 | No (119, 232, 253)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
6 | No (119, 233, 253)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
7 | No (119, 234, 253)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
8 | No (119, 235, 253)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
9 | No (119, 236, 253)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
10 | No (119, 237, 253)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
11 | No (119, 238, 253)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
12 | No (119, 239, 253)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
13 | No (119, 240, 253)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
14 | No (119, 241, 253)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
15 | No (119, 242, 253)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
16 | No (119, 243, 253)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
17 | No (119, 244, 253)-net in base 2 | [i] |