Information on Result #520986

There is no (128, 236, 280)-net in base 2, because extracting embedded orthogonal array would yield OA(2236, 280, S2, 108), but

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (128, 237, 280)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction
2No (128, 238, 280)-net in base 2 [i]
3No (128, 239, 280)-net in base 2 [i]
4No (128, 240, 280)-net in base 2 [i]
5No (128, 241, 280)-net in base 2 [i]
6No (128, 242, 280)-net in base 2 [i]
7No (128, 243, 280)-net in base 2 [i]
8No (128, 244, 280)-net in base 2 [i]
9No (128, 245, 280)-net in base 2 [i]
10No (128, 246, 280)-net in base 2 [i]
11No (128, 247, 280)-net in base 2 [i]
12No (128, 248, 280)-net in base 2 [i]
13No (128, 249, 280)-net in base 2 [i]
14No (128, 250, 280)-net in base 2 [i]
15No (128, 251, 280)-net in base 2 [i]
16No (128, 252, 280)-net in base 2 [i]
17No (128, 253, 280)-net in base 2 [i]
18No (128, 254, 280)-net in base 2 [i]
19No (128, 255, 280)-net in base 2 [i]
20No (128, 256, 280)-net in base 2 [i]
21No (128, 257, 280)-net in base 2 [i]
22No (128, 258, 280)-net in base 2 [i]
23No (128, 259, 280)-net in base 2 [i]
24No (128, 260, 280)-net in base 2 [i]