Information on Result #520989

There is no (129, 237, 285)-net in base 2, because extracting embedded orthogonal array would yield OA(2237, 285, S2, 108), but

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (129, 238, 285)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction
2No (129, 239, 285)-net in base 2 [i]
3No (129, 240, 285)-net in base 2 [i]
4No (129, 241, 285)-net in base 2 [i]
5No (129, 242, 285)-net in base 2 [i]
6No (129, 243, 285)-net in base 2 [i]
7No (129, 244, 285)-net in base 2 [i]
8No (129, 245, 285)-net in base 2 [i]
9No (129, 246, 285)-net in base 2 [i]
10No (129, 247, 285)-net in base 2 [i]
11No (129, 248, 285)-net in base 2 [i]
12No (129, 249, 285)-net in base 2 [i]
13No (129, 250, 285)-net in base 2 [i]
14No (129, 251, 285)-net in base 2 [i]
15No (129, 252, 285)-net in base 2 [i]
16No (129, 253, 285)-net in base 2 [i]
17No (129, 254, 285)-net in base 2 [i]
18No (129, 255, 285)-net in base 2 [i]
19No (129, 256, 285)-net in base 2 [i]
20No (129, 257, 285)-net in base 2 [i]
21No (129, 258, 285)-net in base 2 [i]
22No (129, 259, 285)-net in base 2 [i]
23No (129, 260, 285)-net in base 2 [i]