Information on Result #520989
There is no (129, 237, 285)-net in base 2, because extracting embedded orthogonal array would yield OA(2237, 285, S2, 108), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 56343 399996 195265 169227 114420 218575 369487 305782 122681 969429 903696 483971 902670 896111 812608 / 204485 216198 046875 > 2237 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (129, 238, 285)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
2 | No (129, 239, 285)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
3 | No (129, 240, 285)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
4 | No (129, 241, 285)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
5 | No (129, 242, 285)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
6 | No (129, 243, 285)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
7 | No (129, 244, 285)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
8 | No (129, 245, 285)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
9 | No (129, 246, 285)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
10 | No (129, 247, 285)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
11 | No (129, 248, 285)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
12 | No (129, 249, 285)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
13 | No (129, 250, 285)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
14 | No (129, 251, 285)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
15 | No (129, 252, 285)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
16 | No (129, 253, 285)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
17 | No (129, 254, 285)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
18 | No (129, 255, 285)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
19 | No (129, 256, 285)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
20 | No (129, 257, 285)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
21 | No (129, 258, 285)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
22 | No (129, 259, 285)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
23 | No (129, 260, 285)-net in base 2 | [i] |