Information on Result #522361

There is no (56, 235, 239)-net in base 4, because extracting embedded orthogonal array would yield OA(4235, 239, S4, 179), but

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (56, 236, 239)-net in base 4 [i]m-Reduction
2No (56, 237, 239)-net in base 4 [i]
3No (56, 238, 239)-net in base 4 [i]
4No (56, 239, 239)-net in base 4 [i]
5No (56, 240, 239)-net in base 4 [i]
6No (56, 241, 239)-net in base 4 [i]
7No (56, 242, 239)-net in base 4 [i]
8No (56, 243, 239)-net in base 4 [i]
9No (56, 244, 239)-net in base 4 [i]
10No (56, 245, 239)-net in base 4 [i]
11No (56, 246, 239)-net in base 4 [i]
12No (56, 247, 239)-net in base 4 [i]
13No (56, 248, 239)-net in base 4 [i]
14No (56, 249, 239)-net in base 4 [i]
15No (56, 250, 239)-net in base 4 [i]
16No (56, 251, 239)-net in base 4 [i]
17No (56, 252, 239)-net in base 4 [i]
18No (56, 253, 239)-net in base 4 [i]
19No (56, 254, 239)-net in base 4 [i]
20No (56, 255, 239)-net in base 4 [i]
21No (56, 256, 239)-net in base 4 [i]
22No (56, 257, 239)-net in base 4 [i]
23No (56, 258, 239)-net in base 4 [i]
24No (56, 259, 239)-net in base 4 [i]
25No (56, 260, 239)-net in base 4 [i]