Information on Result #523539
There is no (4, 95, 49)-net in base 9, because extracting embedded OOA would yield OOA(995, 49, S9, 2, 91), but
- the bound derived from the LP bound by Trinker shows that N ≤ 645 < 93 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (4, 96, 49)-net in base 9 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
| 2 | No (4, 97, 49)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 3 | No (4, 98, 49)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 4 | No (4, 99, 49)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 5 | No (4, 100, 49)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 6 | No (4, 101, 49)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 7 | No (4, 102, 49)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 8 | No (4, 103, 49)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 9 | No (4, 104, 49)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 10 | No (4, 105, 49)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 11 | No (4, 106, 49)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 12 | No (4, 107, 49)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 13 | No (4, 108, 49)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 14 | No (4, 109, 49)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 15 | No (4, 110, 49)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 16 | No (4, 111, 49)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 17 | No (4, 112, 49)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 18 | No (4, 113, 49)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 19 | No (4, 114, 49)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 20 | No (4, 115, 49)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 21 | No (4, 116, 49)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 22 | No (4, 117, 49)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 23 | No (4, 118, 49)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 24 | No (4, 119, 49)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 25 | No (4, 120, 49)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 26 | No (4, 121, 49)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 27 | No (4, 122, 49)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 28 | No (4, 123, 49)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 29 | No (4, 124, 49)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 30 | No (4, 125, 49)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 31 | No (4, 126, 49)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 32 | No (4, 127, 49)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 33 | No (4, 128, 49)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 34 | No (4, 129, 49)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 35 | No (4, 130, 49)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 36 | No (4, 131, 49)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 37 | No (4, 132, 49)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 38 | No (4, 133, 49)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 39 | No (4, 134, 49)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 40 | No (4, 135, 49)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 41 | No (4, 136, 49)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 42 | No (4, 137, 49)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 43 | No (4, 138, 49)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 44 | No (4, 139, 49)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 45 | No (4, 140, 49)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 46 | No (4, 141, 49)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 47 | No (4, 142, 49)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 48 | No (4, 143, 49)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 49 | No (4, 144, 49)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 50 | No (4, 145, 49)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 51 | No (4, 146, 49)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 52 | No (4, 147, 49)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 53 | No (4, 148, 49)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 54 | No (4, 149, 49)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 55 | No (4, 150, 49)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 56 | No (4, m, 49)-net in base 9 for arbitrarily large m | [i] | m-Reduction from Arbitrarily Large Net | |