Information on Result #523791

There is no (19, 124, 299)-net in base 9, because extracting embedded orthogonal array would yield OA(9124, 299, S9, 105), but

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (19, 125, 299)-net in base 9 [i]m-Reduction
2No (19, 126, 299)-net in base 9 [i]
3No (19, 127, 299)-net in base 9 [i]
4No (19, 128, 299)-net in base 9 [i]
5No (19, 129, 299)-net in base 9 [i]
6No (19, 130, 299)-net in base 9 [i]
7No (19, 131, 299)-net in base 9 [i]
8No (19, 132, 299)-net in base 9 [i]
9No (19, 133, 299)-net in base 9 [i]
10No (19, 134, 299)-net in base 9 [i]
11No (19, 135, 299)-net in base 9 [i]
12No (19, 136, 299)-net in base 9 [i]
13No (19, 137, 299)-net in base 9 [i]
14No (19, 138, 299)-net in base 9 [i]
15No (19, 139, 299)-net in base 9 [i]
16No (19, 140, 299)-net in base 9 [i]
17No (19, 141, 299)-net in base 9 [i]
18No (19, 142, 299)-net in base 9 [i]
19No (19, 143, 299)-net in base 9 [i]
20No (19, 144, 299)-net in base 9 [i]
21No (19, 145, 299)-net in base 9 [i]
22No (19, 146, 299)-net in base 9 [i]
23No (19, 147, 299)-net in base 9 [i]
24No (19, 148, 299)-net in base 9 [i]
25No (19, 149, 299)-net in base 9 [i]
26No (19, 150, 299)-net in base 9 [i]