Information on Result #523792

There is no (20, 125, 300)-net in base 9, because extracting embedded orthogonal array would yield OA(9125, 300, S9, 105), but

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (20, 126, 300)-net in base 9 [i]m-Reduction
2No (20, 127, 300)-net in base 9 [i]
3No (20, 128, 300)-net in base 9 [i]
4No (20, 129, 300)-net in base 9 [i]
5No (20, 130, 300)-net in base 9 [i]
6No (20, 131, 300)-net in base 9 [i]
7No (20, 132, 300)-net in base 9 [i]
8No (20, 133, 300)-net in base 9 [i]
9No (20, 134, 300)-net in base 9 [i]
10No (20, 135, 300)-net in base 9 [i]
11No (20, 136, 300)-net in base 9 [i]
12No (20, 137, 300)-net in base 9 [i]
13No (20, 138, 300)-net in base 9 [i]
14No (20, 139, 300)-net in base 9 [i]
15No (20, 140, 300)-net in base 9 [i]
16No (20, 141, 300)-net in base 9 [i]
17No (20, 142, 300)-net in base 9 [i]
18No (20, 143, 300)-net in base 9 [i]
19No (20, 144, 300)-net in base 9 [i]
20No (20, 145, 300)-net in base 9 [i]
21No (20, 146, 300)-net in base 9 [i]
22No (20, 147, 300)-net in base 9 [i]
23No (20, 148, 300)-net in base 9 [i]
24No (20, 149, 300)-net in base 9 [i]
25No (20, 150, 300)-net in base 9 [i]