Information on Result #523998

There is no (7, 111, 120)-net in base 16, because extracting embedded orthogonal array would yield OA(16111, 120, S16, 104), but

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (7, 112, 120)-net in base 16 [i]m-Reduction
2No (7, 113, 120)-net in base 16 [i]
3No (7, 114, 120)-net in base 16 [i]
4No (7, 115, 120)-net in base 16 [i]
5No (7, 116, 120)-net in base 16 [i]
6No (7, 117, 120)-net in base 16 [i]
7No (7, 118, 120)-net in base 16 [i]
8No (7, 119, 120)-net in base 16 [i]
9No (7, 120, 120)-net in base 16 [i]
10No (7, 121, 120)-net in base 16 [i]
11No (7, 122, 120)-net in base 16 [i]
12No (7, 123, 120)-net in base 16 [i]
13No (7, 124, 120)-net in base 16 [i]
14No (7, 125, 120)-net in base 16 [i]
15No (7, 126, 120)-net in base 16 [i]
16No (7, 127, 120)-net in base 16 [i]
17No (7, 128, 120)-net in base 16 [i]
18No (7, 129, 120)-net in base 16 [i]
19No (7, 130, 120)-net in base 16 [i]
20No (7, m, 120)-net in base 16 for arbitrarily large m [i]m-Reduction from Arbitrarily Large Net