Information on Result #546314

There is no linear OA(2165, 183, F2, 82) (dual of [183, 18, 83]-code), because residual code would yield OA(283, 100, S2, 41), but

Mode: Bound (linear).

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No linear OA(2166, 184, F2, 83) (dual of [184, 18, 84]-code) [i]Truncation
2No linear OOA(2166, 183, F2, 2, 83) (dual of [(183, 2), 200, 84]-NRT-code) [i]m-Reduction for OOAs
3No linear OOA(2165, 183, F2, 2, 82) (dual of [(183, 2), 201, 83]-NRT-code) [i]Depth Reduction
4No linear OOA(2165, 183, F2, 3, 82) (dual of [(183, 3), 384, 83]-NRT-code) [i]
5No linear OOA(2165, 183, F2, 4, 82) (dual of [(183, 4), 567, 83]-NRT-code) [i]
6No linear OOA(2165, 183, F2, 5, 82) (dual of [(183, 5), 750, 83]-NRT-code) [i]
7No linear OOA(2165, 183, F2, 6, 82) (dual of [(183, 6), 933, 83]-NRT-code) [i]
8No linear OOA(2165, 183, F2, 7, 82) (dual of [(183, 7), 1116, 83]-NRT-code) [i]
9No linear OOA(2165, 183, F2, 8, 82) (dual of [(183, 8), 1299, 83]-NRT-code) [i]
10No digital (83, 165, 183)-net over F2 [i]Extracting Embedded Orthogonal Array