Information on Result #546411
There is no linear OA(2189, 206, F2, 94) (dual of [206, 17, 95]-code), because residual code would yield OA(295, 111, S2, 47), but
- 1 times truncation [i] would yield OA(294, 110, S2, 46), but
- the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 70 671520 962723 789133 441203 699712 / 3451 > 294 [i]
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No linear OA(2190, 207, F2, 95) (dual of [207, 17, 96]-code) | [i] | Truncation | |
| 2 | No linear OOA(2190, 206, F2, 2, 95) (dual of [(206, 2), 222, 96]-NRT-code) | [i] | m-Reduction for OOAs | |
| 3 | No linear OOA(2189, 206, F2, 2, 94) (dual of [(206, 2), 223, 95]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
| 4 | No linear OOA(2189, 206, F2, 3, 94) (dual of [(206, 3), 429, 95]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 5 | No linear OOA(2189, 206, F2, 4, 94) (dual of [(206, 4), 635, 95]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 6 | No linear OOA(2189, 206, F2, 5, 94) (dual of [(206, 5), 841, 95]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 7 | No linear OOA(2189, 206, F2, 6, 94) (dual of [(206, 6), 1047, 95]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 8 | No linear OOA(2189, 206, F2, 7, 94) (dual of [(206, 7), 1253, 95]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 9 | No linear OOA(2189, 206, F2, 8, 94) (dual of [(206, 8), 1459, 95]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 10 | No digital (95, 189, 206)-net over F2 | [i] | Extracting Embedded Orthogonal Array | |