Information on Result #547078

There is no linear OA(3246, 269, F3, 162) (dual of [269, 23, 163]-code), because residual code would yield OA(384, 106, S3, 54), but

Mode: Bound (linear).

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No linear OA(3247, 270, F3, 163) (dual of [270, 23, 164]-code) [i]Truncation
2No linear OA(3248, 271, F3, 164) (dual of [271, 23, 165]-code) [i]
3No linear OOA(3247, 269, F3, 2, 163) (dual of [(269, 2), 291, 164]-NRT-code) [i]m-Reduction for OOAs
4No linear OOA(3248, 269, F3, 2, 164) (dual of [(269, 2), 290, 165]-NRT-code) [i]
5No linear OOA(3246, 269, F3, 2, 162) (dual of [(269, 2), 292, 163]-NRT-code) [i]Depth Reduction
6No linear OOA(3246, 269, F3, 3, 162) (dual of [(269, 3), 561, 163]-NRT-code) [i]
7No linear OOA(3246, 269, F3, 4, 162) (dual of [(269, 4), 830, 163]-NRT-code) [i]
8No linear OOA(3246, 269, F3, 5, 162) (dual of [(269, 5), 1099, 163]-NRT-code) [i]
9No digital (84, 246, 269)-net over F3 [i]Extracting Embedded Orthogonal Array