Information on Result #547365

There is no linear OA(4228, 368, F4, 164) (dual of [368, 140, 165]-code), because residual code would yield OA(464, 203, S4, 41), but

Mode: Bound (linear).

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No linear OA(4229, 369, F4, 165) (dual of [369, 140, 166]-code) [i]Truncation
2No linear OA(4230, 370, F4, 166) (dual of [370, 140, 167]-code) [i]
3No linear OA(4231, 371, F4, 167) (dual of [371, 140, 168]-code) [i]
4No linear OOA(4229, 368, F4, 2, 165) (dual of [(368, 2), 507, 166]-NRT-code) [i]m-Reduction for OOAs
5No linear OOA(4230, 368, F4, 2, 166) (dual of [(368, 2), 506, 167]-NRT-code) [i]
6No linear OOA(4231, 368, F4, 2, 167) (dual of [(368, 2), 505, 168]-NRT-code) [i]
7No linear OOA(4228, 368, F4, 2, 164) (dual of [(368, 2), 508, 165]-NRT-code) [i]Depth Reduction
8No linear OOA(4228, 368, F4, 3, 164) (dual of [(368, 3), 876, 165]-NRT-code) [i]
9No digital (64, 228, 368)-net over F4 [i]Extracting Embedded Orthogonal Array