Information on Result #547403

There is no linear OA(4231, 255, F4, 172) (dual of [255, 24, 173]-code), because residual code would yield OA(459, 82, S4, 43), but

Mode: Bound (linear).

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No linear OA(4232, 256, F4, 173) (dual of [256, 24, 174]-code) [i]Truncation
2No linear OA(4233, 257, F4, 174) (dual of [257, 24, 175]-code) [i]
3No linear OA(4234, 258, F4, 175) (dual of [258, 24, 176]-code) [i]
4No linear OOA(4232, 255, F4, 2, 173) (dual of [(255, 2), 278, 174]-NRT-code) [i]m-Reduction for OOAs
5No linear OOA(4233, 255, F4, 2, 174) (dual of [(255, 2), 277, 175]-NRT-code) [i]
6No linear OOA(4234, 255, F4, 2, 175) (dual of [(255, 2), 276, 176]-NRT-code) [i]
7No linear OOA(4231, 255, F4, 2, 172) (dual of [(255, 2), 279, 173]-NRT-code) [i]Depth Reduction
8No linear OOA(4231, 255, F4, 3, 172) (dual of [(255, 3), 534, 173]-NRT-code) [i]
9No digital (59, 231, 255)-net over F4 [i]Extracting Embedded Orthogonal Array