Information on Result #547633

There is no linear OA(1651, 68, F16, 48) (dual of [68, 17, 49]-code), because residual code would yield OA(163, 19, S16, 3), but

Mode: Bound (linear).

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No linear OA(1652, 69, F16, 49) (dual of [69, 17, 50]-code) [i]Truncation
2No linear OA(1653, 70, F16, 50) (dual of [70, 17, 51]-code) [i]
3No linear OA(1654, 71, F16, 51) (dual of [71, 17, 52]-code) [i]
4No linear OA(1655, 72, F16, 52) (dual of [72, 17, 53]-code) [i]
5No linear OA(1656, 73, F16, 53) (dual of [73, 17, 54]-code) [i]
6No linear OA(1657, 74, F16, 54) (dual of [74, 17, 55]-code) [i]
7No linear OA(1658, 75, F16, 55) (dual of [75, 17, 56]-code) [i]
8No linear OA(1659, 76, F16, 56) (dual of [76, 17, 57]-code) [i]
9No linear OA(1660, 77, F16, 57) (dual of [77, 17, 58]-code) [i]
10No linear OOA(1652, 68, F16, 2, 49) (dual of [(68, 2), 84, 50]-NRT-code) [i]m-Reduction for OOAs
11No linear OOA(1653, 68, F16, 2, 50) (dual of [(68, 2), 83, 51]-NRT-code) [i]
12No linear OOA(1654, 68, F16, 2, 51) (dual of [(68, 2), 82, 52]-NRT-code) [i]
13No linear OOA(1655, 68, F16, 2, 52) (dual of [(68, 2), 81, 53]-NRT-code) [i]
14No linear OOA(1656, 68, F16, 2, 53) (dual of [(68, 2), 80, 54]-NRT-code) [i]
15No linear OOA(1657, 68, F16, 2, 54) (dual of [(68, 2), 79, 55]-NRT-code) [i]
16No linear OOA(1658, 68, F16, 2, 55) (dual of [(68, 2), 78, 56]-NRT-code) [i]
17No linear OOA(1659, 68, F16, 2, 56) (dual of [(68, 2), 77, 57]-NRT-code) [i]
18No linear OOA(1660, 68, F16, 2, 57) (dual of [(68, 2), 76, 58]-NRT-code) [i]
19No linear OOA(1651, 68, F16, 2, 48) (dual of [(68, 2), 85, 49]-NRT-code) [i]Depth Reduction
20No digital (3, 51, 68)-net over F16 [i]Extracting Embedded Orthogonal Array
21No linear OA(1646, 97, F16, 43) (dual of [97, 51, 44]-code) [i]Construction Y1 (Bound)