Information on Result #547732

There is no linear OA(313, 19, F3, 9) (dual of [19, 6, 10]-code), because construction Y1 would yield
  1. linear OA(312, 15, F3, 9) (dual of [15, 3, 10]-code), but
  2. OA(36, 19, S3, 4), but

Mode: Bound (linear).

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No linear OA(314, 20, F3, 10) (dual of [20, 6, 11]-code) [i]Truncation
2No linear OA(315, 21, F3, 11) (dual of [21, 6, 12]-code) [i]
3No linear OOA(314, 19, F3, 2, 10) (dual of [(19, 2), 24, 11]-NRT-code) [i]m-Reduction for OOAs
4No linear OOA(315, 19, F3, 2, 11) (dual of [(19, 2), 23, 12]-NRT-code) [i]
5No linear OOA(313, 19, F3, 2, 9) (dual of [(19, 2), 25, 10]-NRT-code) [i]Depth Reduction
6No linear OOA(313, 19, F3, 3, 9) (dual of [(19, 3), 44, 10]-NRT-code) [i]
7No linear OOA(313, 19, F3, 4, 9) (dual of [(19, 4), 63, 10]-NRT-code) [i]
8No linear OOA(313, 19, F3, 5, 9) (dual of [(19, 5), 82, 10]-NRT-code) [i]
9No digital (4, 13, 19)-net over F3 [i]Extracting Embedded Orthogonal Array
10No linear OA(314, 30, F3, 9) (dual of [30, 16, 10]-code) [i]Construction Y1 (Bound)