Information on Result #547822
There is no linear OA(46, 154, F4, 3) (dual of [154, 148, 4]-code or 154-cap in PG(5,4)), because construction Y1 would yield
- linear OA(45, 42, F4, 3) (dual of [42, 37, 4]-code or 42-cap in PG(4,4)), but
- linear OA(4148, 154, F4, 112) (dual of [154, 6, 113]-code), but
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code would yield linear OA(4148, 153, F4, 112) (dual of [153, 5, 113]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(436, 40, F4, 28) (dual of [40, 4, 29]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(48, 11, F4, 7) (dual of [11, 3, 8]-code), but
- residual code [i] would yield linear OA(436, 40, F4, 28) (dual of [40, 4, 29]-code), but
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code would yield linear OA(4148, 153, F4, 112) (dual of [153, 5, 113]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No linear OOA(46, 154, F4, 2, 3) (dual of [(154, 2), 302, 4]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
2 | No linear OOA(46, 154, F4, 3, 3) (dual of [(154, 3), 456, 4]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
3 | No digital (3, 6, 154)-net over F4 | [i] | Extracting Embedded Orthogonal Array | |
4 | No linear OA(47, 608, F4, 3) (dual of [608, 601, 4]-code or 608-cap in PG(6,4)) | [i] | Hill Recurrence |