Information on Result #547932

There is no linear OA(519, 42, F5, 15) (dual of [42, 23, 16]-code), because construction Y1 would yield
  1. linear OA(518, 23, F5, 15) (dual of [23, 5, 16]-code), but
  2. OA(523, 42, S5, 19), but

Mode: Bound (linear).

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No linear OA(520, 43, F5, 16) (dual of [43, 23, 17]-code) [i]Truncation
2No linear OA(521, 44, F5, 17) (dual of [44, 23, 18]-code) [i]
3No linear OOA(520, 42, F5, 2, 16) (dual of [(42, 2), 64, 17]-NRT-code) [i]m-Reduction for OOAs
4No linear OOA(521, 42, F5, 2, 17) (dual of [(42, 2), 63, 18]-NRT-code) [i]
5No linear OOA(522, 42, F5, 2, 18) (dual of [(42, 2), 62, 19]-NRT-code) [i]
6No linear OOA(519, 42, F5, 2, 15) (dual of [(42, 2), 65, 16]-NRT-code) [i]Depth Reduction
7No linear OOA(519, 42, F5, 3, 15) (dual of [(42, 3), 107, 16]-NRT-code) [i]
8No digital (4, 19, 42)-net over F5 [i]Extracting Embedded Orthogonal Array