Information on Result #548354

There is no linear OA(2164, 178, F2, 82) (dual of [178, 14, 83]-code), because residual code would yield linear OA(282, 95, F2, 41) (dual of [95, 13, 42]-code), but

Mode: Bound (linear).

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No linear OA(2165, 179, F2, 83) (dual of [179, 14, 84]-code) [i]Truncation
2No linear OOA(2165, 178, F2, 2, 83) (dual of [(178, 2), 191, 84]-NRT-code) [i]m-Reduction for OOAs
3No linear OOA(2164, 178, F2, 2, 82) (dual of [(178, 2), 192, 83]-NRT-code) [i]Depth Reduction
4No linear OOA(2164, 178, F2, 3, 82) (dual of [(178, 3), 370, 83]-NRT-code) [i]
5No linear OOA(2164, 178, F2, 4, 82) (dual of [(178, 4), 548, 83]-NRT-code) [i]
6No linear OOA(2164, 178, F2, 5, 82) (dual of [(178, 5), 726, 83]-NRT-code) [i]
7No linear OOA(2164, 178, F2, 6, 82) (dual of [(178, 6), 904, 83]-NRT-code) [i]
8No linear OOA(2164, 178, F2, 7, 82) (dual of [(178, 7), 1082, 83]-NRT-code) [i]
9No linear OOA(2164, 178, F2, 8, 82) (dual of [(178, 8), 1260, 83]-NRT-code) [i]
10No digital (82, 164, 178)-net over F2 [i]Extracting Embedded Orthogonal Array