Information on Result #548354
There is no linear OA(2164, 178, F2, 82) (dual of [178, 14, 83]-code), because residual code would yield linear OA(282, 95, F2, 41) (dual of [95, 13, 42]-code), but
- 1 times truncation [i] would yield linear OA(281, 94, F2, 40) (dual of [94, 13, 41]-code), but
Mode: Bound (linear).
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No linear OA(2165, 179, F2, 83) (dual of [179, 14, 84]-code) | [i] | Truncation | |
2 | No linear OOA(2165, 178, F2, 2, 83) (dual of [(178, 2), 191, 84]-NRT-code) | [i] | m-Reduction for OOAs | |
3 | No linear OOA(2164, 178, F2, 2, 82) (dual of [(178, 2), 192, 83]-NRT-code) | [i] | Depth Reduction | |
4 | No linear OOA(2164, 178, F2, 3, 82) (dual of [(178, 3), 370, 83]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
5 | No linear OOA(2164, 178, F2, 4, 82) (dual of [(178, 4), 548, 83]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
6 | No linear OOA(2164, 178, F2, 5, 82) (dual of [(178, 5), 726, 83]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
7 | No linear OOA(2164, 178, F2, 6, 82) (dual of [(178, 6), 904, 83]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
8 | No linear OOA(2164, 178, F2, 7, 82) (dual of [(178, 7), 1082, 83]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
9 | No linear OOA(2164, 178, F2, 8, 82) (dual of [(178, 8), 1260, 83]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
10 | No digital (82, 164, 178)-net over F2 | [i] | Extracting Embedded Orthogonal Array |