Information on Result #548439

There is no linear OA(349, 58, F3, 33) (dual of [58, 9, 34]-code), because residual code would yield linear OA(316, 24, F3, 11) (dual of [24, 8, 12]-code), but

Mode: Bound (linear).

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No linear OA(350, 59, F3, 34) (dual of [59, 9, 35]-code) [i]Truncation
2No linear OOA(350, 58, F3, 2, 34) (dual of [(58, 2), 66, 35]-NRT-code) [i]m-Reduction for OOAs
3No linear OOA(349, 58, F3, 2, 33) (dual of [(58, 2), 67, 34]-NRT-code) [i]Depth Reduction
4No linear OOA(349, 58, F3, 3, 33) (dual of [(58, 3), 125, 34]-NRT-code) [i]
5No linear OOA(349, 58, F3, 4, 33) (dual of [(58, 4), 183, 34]-NRT-code) [i]
6No linear OOA(349, 58, F3, 5, 33) (dual of [(58, 5), 241, 34]-NRT-code) [i]
7No digital (16, 49, 58)-net over F3 [i]Extracting Embedded Orthogonal Array
8No linear OA(3148, 158, F3, 99) (dual of [158, 10, 100]-code) [i]Residual Code