Information on Result #548559

There is no linear OA(2183, 225, F2, 86) (dual of [225, 42, 87]-code), because construction Y1 would yield
  1. linear OA(2182, 211, F2, 86) (dual of [211, 29, 87]-code), but
  2. OA(242, 225, S2, 14), but

Mode: Bound (linear).

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No linear OA(2184, 226, F2, 87) (dual of [226, 42, 88]-code) [i]Truncation
2No linear OA(2185, 227, F2, 88) (dual of [227, 42, 89]-code) [i]
3No linear OA(2186, 228, F2, 89) (dual of [228, 42, 90]-code) [i]
4No linear OOA(2184, 225, F2, 2, 87) (dual of [(225, 2), 266, 88]-NRT-code) [i]m-Reduction for OOAs
5No linear OOA(2185, 225, F2, 2, 88) (dual of [(225, 2), 265, 89]-NRT-code) [i]
6No linear OOA(2186, 225, F2, 2, 89) (dual of [(225, 2), 264, 90]-NRT-code) [i]
7No linear OOA(2187, 225, F2, 2, 90) (dual of [(225, 2), 263, 91]-NRT-code) [i]
8No linear OOA(2188, 225, F2, 2, 91) (dual of [(225, 2), 262, 92]-NRT-code) [i]
9No linear OOA(2183, 225, F2, 2, 86) (dual of [(225, 2), 267, 87]-NRT-code) [i]Depth Reduction
10No linear OOA(2183, 225, F2, 3, 86) (dual of [(225, 3), 492, 87]-NRT-code) [i]
11No linear OOA(2183, 225, F2, 4, 86) (dual of [(225, 4), 717, 87]-NRT-code) [i]
12No linear OOA(2183, 225, F2, 5, 86) (dual of [(225, 5), 942, 87]-NRT-code) [i]
13No linear OOA(2183, 225, F2, 6, 86) (dual of [(225, 6), 1167, 87]-NRT-code) [i]
14No linear OOA(2183, 225, F2, 7, 86) (dual of [(225, 7), 1392, 87]-NRT-code) [i]
15No linear OOA(2183, 225, F2, 8, 86) (dual of [(225, 8), 1617, 87]-NRT-code) [i]
16No digital (97, 183, 225)-net over F2 [i]Extracting Embedded Orthogonal Array
17No linear OA(2184, 249, F2, 86) (dual of [249, 65, 87]-code) [i]Construction Y1 (Bound)