Information on Result #548573

There is no linear OA(310, 28, F3, 6) (dual of [28, 18, 7]-code), because construction Y1 would yield
  1. linear OA(39, 16, F3, 6) (dual of [16, 7, 7]-code), but
  2. linear OA(318, 28, F3, 12) (dual of [28, 10, 13]-code), but

Mode: Bound (linear).

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No linear OOA(310, 28, F3, 2, 6) (dual of [(28, 2), 46, 7]-NRT-code) [i]Depth Reduction
2No linear OOA(310, 28, F3, 3, 6) (dual of [(28, 3), 74, 7]-NRT-code) [i]
3No linear OOA(310, 28, F3, 4, 6) (dual of [(28, 4), 102, 7]-NRT-code) [i]
4No linear OOA(310, 28, F3, 5, 6) (dual of [(28, 5), 130, 7]-NRT-code) [i]
5No digital (4, 10, 28)-net over F3 [i]Extracting Embedded Orthogonal Array