Information on Result #59842

There is no OA(471, 206, S4, 46), because the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 12190 666552 860549 875030 280693 949215 033597 089167 787297 540990 306499 998443 349891 008938 804128 810849 723006 100908 802048 / 2095 122091 727468 263392 248874 603589 540011 988045 238608 933987 894642 253863 > 471

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No OA(472, 207, S4, 47) [i]Truncation
2No OA(473, 208, S4, 48) [i]
3No OA(474, 209, S4, 49) [i]
4No OA(475, 210, S4, 50) [i]
5No OA(476, 211, S4, 51) [i]
6No OA(477, 212, S4, 52) [i]
7No OA(478, 213, S4, 53) [i]
8No OA(479, 214, S4, 54) [i]
9No OA(480, 215, S4, 55) [i]
10No OA(481, 216, S4, 56) [i]
11No OOA(472, 206, S4, 2, 47) [i]m-Reduction for OOAs
12No OOA(474, 206, S4, 2, 49) [i]
13No OOA(471, 206, S4, 2, 46) [i]Depth Reduction
14No OOA(471, 206, S4, 3, 46) [i]
15No (25, 71, 206)-net in base 4 [i]Extracting Embedded Orthogonal Array
16No linear OA(4255, 391, F4, 184) (dual of [391, 136, 185]-code) [i]Residual Code