Information on Result #62239

There is no OA(965, 225, S9, 54), because the linear programming bound shows that M ≥ 1 407158 071957 405502 080634 170649 666681 351029 811313 477564 249946 509212 567552 061950 290997 535422 640957 000607 894786 170825 293062 081202 608589 929200 / 12919 598267 682231 631223 118900 223172 391171 482474 551992 207926 453044 062169 872017 > 965

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No OA(966, 226, S9, 55) [i]Truncation
2No OA(967, 227, S9, 56) [i]
3No OA(968, 228, S9, 57) [i]
4No OA(969, 229, S9, 58) [i]
5No OA(970, 230, S9, 59) [i]
6No OA(971, 231, S9, 60) [i]
7No OA(972, 232, S9, 61) [i]
8No OA(973, 233, S9, 62) [i]
9No OA(974, 234, S9, 63) [i]
10No OA(975, 235, S9, 64) [i]
11No OA(976, 236, S9, 65) [i]
12No OA(977, 237, S9, 66) [i]
13No OA(978, 238, S9, 67) [i]
14No OA(979, 239, S9, 68) [i]
15No OA(980, 240, S9, 69) [i]
16No OA(981, 241, S9, 70) [i]
17No OA(982, 242, S9, 71) [i]
18No OA(983, 243, S9, 72) [i]
19No OOA(966, 225, S9, 2, 55) [i]m-Reduction for OOAs
20No OOA(967, 225, S9, 2, 56) [i]
21No OOA(968, 225, S9, 2, 57) [i]
22No OOA(969, 225, S9, 2, 58) [i]
23No OOA(970, 225, S9, 2, 59) [i]
24No OOA(971, 225, S9, 2, 60) [i]
25No OOA(972, 225, S9, 2, 61) [i]
26No OOA(973, 225, S9, 2, 62) [i]
27No OOA(974, 225, S9, 2, 63) [i]
28No OOA(975, 225, S9, 2, 64) [i]
29No OOA(976, 225, S9, 2, 65) [i]
30No OOA(977, 225, S9, 2, 66) [i]
31No OOA(978, 225, S9, 2, 67) [i]
32No OOA(979, 225, S9, 2, 68) [i]
33No OOA(980, 225, S9, 2, 69) [i]
34No OOA(981, 225, S9, 2, 70) [i]
35No OOA(982, 225, S9, 2, 71) [i]
36No OOA(983, 225, S9, 2, 72) [i]
37No OOA(965, 225, S9, 2, 54) [i]Depth Reduction
38No OOA(965, 225, S9, 3, 54) [i]
39No (11, 65, 225)-net in base 9 [i]Extracting Embedded Orthogonal Array