Information on Result #629452
Linear OA(2207, 225, F2, 85) (dual of [225, 18, 86]-code), using concatenation of two codes based on
- linear OA(466, 75, F4, 42) (dual of [75, 9, 43]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(466, 76, F4, 42) (dual of [76, 10, 43]-code), using
- 9 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(475, 85, F4, 51) (dual of [85, 10, 52]-code), using
- concatenation of two codes [i] based on
- 9 times truncation [i] based on linear OA(475, 85, F4, 51) (dual of [85, 10, 52]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(466, 76, F4, 42) (dual of [76, 10, 43]-code), using
- linear OA(21, 3, F2, 1) (dual of [3, 2, 2]-code), using
- discarding factors / shortening the dual code based on linear OA(21, s, F2, 1) (dual of [s, s−1, 2]-code) for arbitrarily large s, using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
None.