Information on Result #664036

Linear OA(9109, 128, F9, 69) (dual of [128, 19, 70]-code), using generalized (u, u+v)-construction based on
  1. linear OA(99, 16, F9, 8) (dual of [16, 7, 9]-code), using
  2. linear OA(910, 16, F9, 9) (dual of [16, 6, 10]-code), using
  3. linear OA(912, 16, F9, 11) (dual of [16, 4, 12]-code), using
  4. linear OA(914, 16, F9, 13) (dual of [16, 2, 14]-code), using
  5. linear OA(916, 16, F9, 16) (dual of [16, 0, 17]-code or 16-arc in PG(15,9)), using
  6. linear OA(916, 16, F9, 16) (dual of [16, 0, 17]-code or 16-arc in PG(15,9)) (see above)
  7. linear OA(916, 16, F9, 16) (dual of [16, 0, 17]-code or 16-arc in PG(15,9)) (see above)
  8. linear OA(916, 16, F9, 16) (dual of [16, 0, 17]-code or 16-arc in PG(15,9)) (see above)

Mode: Constructive and linear.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Compare with Markus Grassl’s online database of code parameters.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1Linear OOA(9109, 64, F9, 2, 69) (dual of [(64, 2), 19, 70]-NRT-code) [i]OOA Folding