Information on Result #672649

Linear OA(2176, 16420, F2, 25) (dual of [16420, 16244, 26]-code), using construction X applied to C([0,12]) ⊂ C([0,10]) based on
  1. linear OA(2169, 16385, F2, 25) (dual of [16385, 16216, 26]-code), using the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 16385 | 228−1, defining interval I = [0,12], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−12,−11,…,12}|+1 = 26 (BCH-bound) [i]
  2. linear OA(2141, 16385, F2, 21) (dual of [16385, 16244, 22]-code), using the expurgated narrow-sense BCH-code C(I) with length 16385 | 228−1, defining interval I = [0,10], and minimum distance d ≥ |{−10,−9,…,10}|+1 = 22 (BCH-bound) [i]
  3. linear OA(27, 35, F2, 3) (dual of [35, 28, 4]-code or 35-cap in PG(6,2)), using

Mode: Constructive and linear.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1Linear OA(2176, 16420, F2, 24) (dual of [16420, 16244, 25]-code) [i]Strength Reduction
2Linear OA(2177, 16421, F2, 25) (dual of [16421, 16244, 26]-code) [i]Code Embedding in Larger Space
3Linear OA(2178, 16422, F2, 25) (dual of [16422, 16244, 26]-code) [i]
4Linear OA(2179, 16423, F2, 25) (dual of [16423, 16244, 26]-code) [i]
5Linear OA(2180, 16424, F2, 25) (dual of [16424, 16244, 26]-code) [i]
6Linear OA(2175, 16419, F2, 24) (dual of [16419, 16244, 25]-code) [i]Truncation
7Linear OOA(2176, 8210, F2, 2, 25) (dual of [(8210, 2), 16244, 26]-NRT-code) [i]OOA Folding
8Linear OOA(2176, 5473, F2, 3, 25) (dual of [(5473, 3), 16243, 26]-NRT-code) [i]
9Linear OOA(2176, 4105, F2, 4, 25) (dual of [(4105, 4), 16244, 26]-NRT-code) [i]
10Linear OOA(2176, 3284, F2, 5, 25) (dual of [(3284, 5), 16244, 26]-NRT-code) [i]