Information on Result #909010
Linear OOA(2151, 77, F2, 2, 106) (dual of [(77, 2), 3, 107]-NRT-code), using juxtaposition based on
- linear OOA(23, 3, F2, 2, 3) (dual of [(3, 2), 3, 4]-NRT-code), using
- extended Reed–Solomon NRT-code RSe(2;3,2) [i]
- linear OOA(2145, 74, F2, 2, 102) (dual of [(74, 2), 3, 103]-NRT-code), using
- 2 step truncation [i] based on linear OOA(2147, 75, F2, 2, 104) (dual of [(75, 2), 3, 105]-NRT-code), using
- repeating each code word 15 times [i] based on linear OOA(27, 5, F2, 2, 6) (dual of [(5, 2), 3, 7]-NRT-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric NRT-code AGe(2;F,3P) [i] based on function field F/F2 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 5, using
- repeating each code word 15 times [i] based on linear OOA(27, 5, F2, 2, 6) (dual of [(5, 2), 3, 7]-NRT-code), using
- 2 step truncation [i] based on linear OOA(2147, 75, F2, 2, 104) (dual of [(75, 2), 3, 105]-NRT-code), using
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Linear OOA(2151, 77, F2, 2, 105) (dual of [(77, 2), 3, 106]-NRT-code) | [i] | Strength Reduction for OOAs | |
| 2 | Linear OOA(2151, 77, F2, 2, 104) (dual of [(77, 2), 3, 105]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | Linear OOA(2151, 77, F2, 2, 103) (dual of [(77, 2), 3, 104]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 4 | Linear OOA(2151, 77, F2, 2, 102) (dual of [(77, 2), 3, 103]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 5 | Linear OOA(2151, 77, F2, 2, 101) (dual of [(77, 2), 3, 102]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 6 | Linear OOA(2151, 77, F2, 2, 100) (dual of [(77, 2), 3, 101]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 7 | Linear OOA(2151, 77, F2, 2, 99) (dual of [(77, 2), 3, 100]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 8 | Linear OOA(2151, 77, F2, 2, 98) (dual of [(77, 2), 3, 99]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 9 | Linear OOA(2151, 77, F2, 2, 97) (dual of [(77, 2), 3, 98]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||