Information on Result #910094
Linear OOA(579, 41, F5, 2, 68) (dual of [(41, 2), 3, 69]-NRT-code), using juxtaposition based on
- linear OOA(59, 6, F5, 2, 9) (dual of [(6, 2), 3, 10]-NRT-code), using
- extended Reed–Solomon NRT-code RSe(2;3,5) [i]
- linear OOA(567, 35, F5, 2, 58) (dual of [(35, 2), 3, 59]-NRT-code), using
- juxtaposition [i] based on
- linear OOA(57, 5, F5, 2, 7) (dual of [(5, 2), 3, 8]-NRT-code), using
- Reed–Solomon NRT-code RS(2;3,5) [i]
- linear OOA(557, 30, F5, 2, 50) (dual of [(30, 2), 3, 51]-NRT-code), using
- repeating each code word 3 times [i] based on linear OOA(517, 10, F5, 2, 16) (dual of [(10, 2), 3, 17]-NRT-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric NRT-code AGe(2;F,3P) [i] based on function field F/F5 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 10, using
- repeating each code word 3 times [i] based on linear OOA(517, 10, F5, 2, 16) (dual of [(10, 2), 3, 17]-NRT-code), using
- linear OOA(57, 5, F5, 2, 7) (dual of [(5, 2), 3, 8]-NRT-code), using
- juxtaposition [i] based on
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Linear OOA(579, 41, F5, 2, 67) (dual of [(41, 2), 3, 68]-NRT-code) | [i] | Strength Reduction for OOAs | |
| 2 | Linear OOA(579, 41, F5, 2, 66) (dual of [(41, 2), 3, 67]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
| 3 | Linear OOA(579, 41, F5, 2, 65) (dual of [(41, 2), 3, 66]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||