Information on Result #910095
Linear OOA(581, 42, F5, 2, 70) (dual of [(42, 2), 3, 71]-NRT-code), using juxtaposition based on
- linear OOA(59, 6, F5, 2, 9) (dual of [(6, 2), 3, 10]-NRT-code), using
- extended Reed–Solomon NRT-code RSe(2;3,5) [i]
- linear OOA(569, 36, F5, 2, 60) (dual of [(36, 2), 3, 61]-NRT-code), using
- juxtaposition [i] based on
- linear OOA(59, 6, F5, 2, 9) (dual of [(6, 2), 3, 10]-NRT-code) (see above)
- linear OOA(557, 30, F5, 2, 50) (dual of [(30, 2), 3, 51]-NRT-code), using
- repeating each code word 3 times [i] based on linear OOA(517, 10, F5, 2, 16) (dual of [(10, 2), 3, 17]-NRT-code), using
- extended algebraic-geometric NRT-code AGe(2;F,3P) [i] based on function field F/F5 with g(F) = 1 and N(F) ≥ 10, using
- repeating each code word 3 times [i] based on linear OOA(517, 10, F5, 2, 16) (dual of [(10, 2), 3, 17]-NRT-code), using
- juxtaposition [i] based on
Mode: Constructive and linear.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, n and k, k and s, k and t, n and m, m and s, m and t, n and s, n and t.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Linear OOA(580, 41, F5, 2, 69) (dual of [(41, 2), 2, 70]-NRT-code) | [i] | Truncation for OOAs | |
2 | Linear OOA(576, 39, F5, 2, 65) (dual of [(39, 2), 2, 66]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
3 | Linear OOA(575, 39, F5, 2, 64) (dual of [(39, 2), 3, 65]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
4 | Linear OOA(574, 38, F5, 2, 63) (dual of [(38, 2), 2, 64]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
5 | Linear OOA(573, 38, F5, 2, 62) (dual of [(38, 2), 3, 63]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
6 | Linear OOA(572, 37, F5, 2, 61) (dual of [(37, 2), 2, 62]-NRT-code) | [i] | ||
7 | Linear OOA(571, 37, F5, 2, 60) (dual of [(37, 2), 3, 61]-NRT-code) | [i] |